18
1 800 FLOWERS COM INC (FLWS)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY25 materially missed consensus: revenue $331.5M vs $364.2M estimate and Primary EPS -$0.71 vs -$0.34 estimate, driven by weak “everyday” demand, a highly promotional environment, and order-management-system (OMS) remediation costs; GAAP EPS was -$2.80 due to a $138.2M non-cash impairment . Estimates from S&P Global: revenue $364.2M*, EPS -$0.34*, actuals - see tables below.
- Management withdrew near‑term guidance and unveiled “Celebrations Wave,” a multi‑year strategy to build a sentiment‑led ecosystem, alongside naming Adolfo Villagomez as CEO effective May 12, 2025; targeted annualized cost reductions of ~$40M, with ~$17M already executed .
- Segment mix: Consumer Floral & Gifts fell 11.4%, Gourmet Foods & Gift Baskets fell 18.2% (OMS issues/rebates/write‑offs), while BloomNet grew 4.5% with margin expansion; consolidated adjusted EBITDA was -$34.9M vs -$5.7M LY .
- Credit facilities were amended to increase flexibility and modestly adjust commitments; term debt stood at ~$160M, no revolver draw at Q3 end; cash ~$85M, net debt ~$75M, inventory ~$160M .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- BloomNet resilience: revenue +4.5% YoY to $28.6M and gross margin +150 bps to 46.9% on lower florist rebates; segment contribution rose to $8.5M .
- Strategic pivot and leadership: Launch of “Celebrations Wave” (sentiment-led app + site, loyalty revamp, AI personalisation) and appointment of an external CEO to accelerate execution .
- Clear cost agenda and targets: Annualized cost reductions of ~$40M targeted (with ~$17M already executed), aimed at restoring margins and improving cash flow over time .
What Went Wrong
- Demand softness and promos: Revenue -12.6% to $331.5M; adjusted gross margin down 350 bps to 33.1% ex-$4.6M OMS costs, reflecting a highly promotional environment and deleverage on lower sales .
- OMS implementation fallout: $4.6M of rebates/replacements/write‑offs in Q3; management called the OMS rollout a “colossal screw up,” with ~$20M top‑line hit in Q2 and ~$11M cumulative incremental costs across Q2–Q3 .
- Large non‑cash impairment: $138.2M goodwill/trade name charge (Consumer Floral & Gifts, Personalization Mall), pushing GAAP EPS to -$2.80 .
Financial Results
Sequential trend (oldest → newest)
Q3 YoY comparison (oldest → newest)
Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus
Segment breakdown – Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024
KPIs and balance sheet highlights (Q3 FY25)
- Cash and cash equivalents: ~$85M; Net debt: ~$75M; Inventory: ~$160M; Term debt: ~$160M; Revolver borrowings: $0 .
- Non‑cash impairment: $138.2M (Consumer Floral & Gifts; Personalization Mall trade name) .
- Adjusted operating expenses (ex impairment, OMS/severance/NQDC): $160.7M, essentially flat YoY .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are embarking on our sixth wave of evolution… Celebrations Wave… we believe it will be our most transformative yet.” — Jim McCann (prepared remarks) .
- “We plan to reduce costs by approximately $40 million on an annualized basis, including $17 million in reductions already executed.” — James Langrock (prepared remarks) .
- “The implementation of the order management system was a colossal screw up on our part… we’ll have that all taken care of by the end of our fiscal 2025.” — Jim McCann (Q&A) .
- “At present, there is an incremental 10% tariff… we estimate our tariff exposure to be approximately $55 million… most significant impact on our personalization and wholesale businesses.” — James Langrock (prepared remarks) .
- “BloomNet… gross profit margin increased 150 basis points to 46.9% due to lower florist rebates.” — Press release .
Q&A Highlights
- Quarter cadence: Everyday demand softness in Jan/Mar offset a decent Valentine’s; Easter timing hurt Q3; revenue would be -8.9% ex‑Easter shift .
- OMS impact quantified: ~$20M Q2 top‑line hit; ~$4.6M Q3 gross profit impact; ~$11M cumulative incremental costs across Q2–Q3 (incl. inventory write‑offs) .
- Tariff exposure: ~$55M exposure (about $70M imported COGS; roughly half from China); actions include vendor negotiation, component changes, assortment shifts, selective pricing .
- Share/mix: Company believes it maintained or gained share in larger brands despite promotions; higher-income customers remained resilient .
- April/4Q setup: April up on Easter shift; expect Q4 slightly better than Q3; Mother’s Day visibility pending .
Estimates Context
- Q3 FY25 vs S&P Global: revenue $331.5M vs $364.2M consensus (miss), Primary EPS -$0.71 vs -$0.34 consensus (miss); 2 estimates in each case. Primary drivers: weak everyday demand, elevated promotions, OMS remediation costs, and the $138.2M non‑cash impairment (GAAP only) . Values marked with * are from S&P Global and shown in the “Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus” table above.
- Revisions outlook: Guidance withdrawal and new strategy likely prompt downward EPS and revenue revisions near-term; cost actions could support medium‑term estimate stabilization once execution milestones become visible .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The quarter was weak and below consensus on both revenue and EPS as everyday demand remains pressured and promotions intensified; additional OMS clean‑up weighed on margins .
- Near‑term visibility is low post guidance withdrawal, but management is pursuing ~$40M annualized cost reductions and a strategic pivot to a sentiment‑led ecosystem (Celebrations Wave) to lift frequency, conversion and marketing efficiency .
- Balance sheet/liquidity adequate with ~$85M cash, ~$75M net debt, no revolver borrowings, and a recently amended credit agreement that modestly adjusted commitments and flexibility .
- BloomNet remains a bright spot with growth and margin expansion; Consumer Floral & Gifts and Gourmet Food face macro and execution headwinds near‑term .
- Tariffs (~$55M exposure) and marketing channel shifts (organic→paid/AI overviews) are structural headwinds that FLWS plans to mitigate via sourcing, assortment and price architecture .
- Upcoming catalysts/risks: Mother’s Day performance, pace of OMS normalization by FY25 year‑end, CEO transition momentum, and evidence of cost savings flowing through P&L .
- Medium‑term, successful execution on AI‑driven personalization, loyalty, and card‑led ladder strategy could re‑accelerate frequency and support margin recovery; investors should look for sequential improvements in adjusted gross margin and operating expense ratio .